Legal Opinion

Hines v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1926No. 24,860PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGemmill, J.

Appellant was prosecuted upon an affidavit containing two counts, alleging violations of the prohibition law. Count one charged appellant with unlawfully manufacturing intoxicating liquor; Acts 1923, ch. 23, §1. And count five charged her with unlawfully maintaining and assisting in maintaining a common nuisance. Acts 1917, ch. 4, §20.

The trial was by jury and she was found guilty as charged in the first count. From the judgment rendered on the verdict, she has appealed. The only as signment of error relied upon is that the court erred in overruling her motion for a new trial. By this motion,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Remus v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1923
  2. Hauk v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Chicco v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1922
  4. Lee v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Ginn v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1903

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Peterson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Winters v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Speybroeck v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Piercefield v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1926
  5. McQueary v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API