Legal Opinion
State v. Brusenhan
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided February 16, 1968No. 106PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
OMAN, Judge.
This is an appeal from an order denying defendant’s motion for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to Rule 93 [§ 21-1-1(93) N.M.S.A. 1953 (Supp.1967)].
Defendant pleaded guilty to a charge of burglary on August 26, 1966. The imposition of sentence was deferred for a period of two years, conditioned on his compliance with the terms and provisions of the probation under which he was placed for this period.
On May 5, 1967, proceedings were conducted pursuant to an order to show cause why defendant’s probation should not be revoked and sentence imposed. The trial court found…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Mempa v. RhaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Escoe v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Burns v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Scott v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
- Simpson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- State v. ChamberlainNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. GuthrieNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. MurrayNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
- State v. MadridNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972
- Wink v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.