Legal Opinion

Wink v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided September 13, 1989No. 112, September Term, 1988PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RODOWSKY, Judge.

The instant appeal is in a probation revocation case. In the trial court that kind of case “typically involves two distinct components: (1) a retrospective factual question whether the probationer has violated a condition of probation; and (2) a discretionary determination by the sentencing authority whether violation of a condition warrants revocation of probation.” Black v. Romano, 471 U.S. 606, 611, 105 S.Ct. 2254, 2257, 85 L.Ed.2d 636, 642 (1985). On the first issue the State has both the burden to come forward with evidence and the burden of persuasion. McDonald v. State,…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Black v. RomanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Escoe v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Armstrong v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
  5. In Re Formal Inquiry Concerning Judge DienerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State v. DavisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  2. Bernadyn v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  3. Jefferson-El v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  4. State v. DopkowskiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  5. State v. HodgesCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1990

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API