Shephard v. Widhalm
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Morris
¶1 Roslyn Shephard (“Shephard”) appeals an order from the Ninth Judicial District, Pondera County, as Personal Representative of the estates of Paul Widhalm (“Paul”) and Evonne Widhalm (“Evonne”). Robert Widhalm (“Robert”) and Dianna Widhalm (collectively, “the Widhalms”) cross-appeal. We affirm.
¶2 The following issues are presented for our review:
¶3 Issue One: Whether the District Court correctly determined that the lease executed on May 11, 2009, was valid without Shephard’s signature as the Personal Representative of Paul’s estate.
¶4 Issue Two: Whether substantial evidence supports the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Plath v. SchonrockMontana Supreme Court · 2003
- Morning Star Enterprises, Inc. v. R. H. Grover, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1991
- Renner v. NemitzMontana Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. ThorpMontana Supreme Court · 2010
- Deschamps v. DeschampsMontana Supreme Court · 1922
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re the Estate of HarrisMontana Supreme Court · 2015
- MEIC v. Westmoreland Rosebud MiningMontana Supreme Court · 2023
- Vicevich v. KultgenMontana Supreme Court · 2026