Madigan v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Carley, Judge.
Appellant was convicted by a jury of aggravated assault and armed robbery. Following the denial of his motion for a new trial, appellant brings this appeal from the judgment entered on the jury verdict. All of appellant’s enumerations of error are concerned with the application of the criminal discovery statute, Ga. L. 1980, pp. 1988, 1989 (Code Ann. § 27-1303).
Appellant cites as error the admission, over objection, of the following testimony: First, a forensic serologist from the Georgia State Crime Laboratory was permitted to testify as to the nature and results of tests which…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Tanner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- Garner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. MadiganSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
- Law v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
- Taylor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
- Luck v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
- Luck v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.