Legal Opinion

Taylor v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 21, 1984No. 68753PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Quillian, Presiding Judge.

The defendant appeals his convictions for rape and burglary. Held:

1. The defendant’s contention that certain items seized as a result of a search should be excluded from evidence is without merit. The defendant filed no written motion to suppress as required by OCGA § 17-5-30 (b). See Brannen v. State, 117 Ga. App. 69 (159 SE2d 476); Peppers v. State, 144 Ga. App. 662 (242 SE2d 330). Furthermore, defense counsel’s statement that he was unaware that defendant’s wife consented to the search, rather than defendant, affords no basis for permitting the issue to be raised…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. ChambersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  2. Tanner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  3. Law v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
  4. Thomas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
  5. Brannen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Wilburn v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
  2. Ford v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1986
  3. Elmore v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
  4. White v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  5. White v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API