Garner v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Pope, Judge.
Phillip Earl Garner appeals his conviction for burglary. Held:
1. In the first four enumerations defendant claims error because the trial court did not exclude evidence of his pretrial statements and evidence derivative thereof because the state had not complied with Code Ann. § 27-1302 (Ga. L. 1980, p. 1388, effective April 1, 1980).
Prior to April 1, 1980 there were no provisions in Georgia law governing pre-trial discovery in criminal cases. See Jarrell v. State, 234 Ga. 410 (4) (216 SE2d 258) (1975); Phillips v. State, 146 Ga. App. 423 (5) (246 SE2d 438) (1978). However, the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Jarrell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
- Birge v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
- New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. McFarleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
- Hicks v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
- Puett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Tanner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- Sears v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
- Thompson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
- Henderson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
- Henson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.