Legal Opinion
State v. Linton
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided June 28, 2004No. 52195-1-IPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
93 P.3d 183 (2004)
122 Wash.App. 73
STATE of Washington, Appellant,
v.
Roy Bernard LINTON, Respondent.
No. 52195-1-I.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.
June 28, 2004.
Seth Aaron Fine, Attorney at Law, Everett, WA, for Respondent.
Dana M. Nelson, Nielsen Broman & Koch PLLC, Seattle, WA, for Appellant.
APPELWICK, J.
Roy Linton was charged with first degree assault. The jury was unable to agree that he had committed first degree assault and rendered a verdict finding Linton guilty of second degree assault. The trial court denied a retrial on the first degree assault charge on the grounds that it…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. LintonWashington Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. RamosCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- State v. EgglestonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- State v. EgglestonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- State v. BennCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.