Legal Opinion

State v. Benn

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided November 15, 2005No. 31122-4-IIPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1

Armstrong, J.

— Gary Michael Benn appeals his two convictions of aggravated murder. He claims that the trial court erred when it allowed the State to proceed on a “single act” aggravating circumstances theory because a jury implicitly acquitted him of that circumstance in his first trial. He also claims that the court erred in: (1) admitting prior testimony when he did not have the opportunity or similar motive to cross-examine the witness, (2) limiting his cross-examination of the State’s expert witnesses concerning learned treatises, (3) excluding a letter he wanted to use to impeach a…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. State v. GunwallWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Richardson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Arizona v. RumseySupreme Court of the United States · 1984

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. BennWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. BennCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  3. State v. BennWashington Supreme Court · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API