Legal Opinion
State v. Ramos
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided November 22, 2004No. 43326-1-I, 43362-8-IPublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
101 P.3d 872 (2004)
124 Wash.App. 334
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Felipe Joseph RAMOS, Appellant.
State of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Mario Alejandro Medina, Appellant.
Nos. 43326-1-I, 43362-8-I.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.
November 22, 2004.
Thomas M. Kummerow, Washington Appellate Project, Christopher Gibson, Nielsen, Broman & Koch PLLC, Seattle, WA, for Appellants.
Deric Martin, King Co. Pros. Attorney, James Morrissey Whisman, King County Prosecutor's Office, Seattle, WA, for Respondent.
ELLINGTON, A.C.J.
The mandatory joinder rule prohibits successive prosecutions for related…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Ackermann v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Klapprott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Price v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- State v. RobertsWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. WatsonWashington Supreme Court · 2002
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- State v. GambleWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. GambleWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. KNUTZCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- State v. MedinaWashington Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.