Legal Opinion
Goldsmith v. Salkey
Texas Supreme Court
Decided January 19, 1938No. 7338PublishedCited by 94 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Judge Martin,
of the Commission of Appeals, delivered the opinion for the Court.
This case is before us upon the following certificate:
“Appellant, Ruth E. Goldsmith, and appellee, J. Sydney Sal-key, were married in St. Louis, Missouri, on June 18, 1924, and established the family domicile there. On February 26, 1926, a daughter, Joan, was born to the Salkeys, and, now eleven years old, still lives to be the subject of this litigation.
“On July 15, 1930, in a proper Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Missouri, where the parties still resided, appellant obtained a decree of divorce from…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Finlay v. FinlayNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Wilson v. ElliottTexas Supreme Court · 1903
- Sheehy v. SheehySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1936
- Krauthoff v. KrauthoffMissouri Court of Appeals · 1915
- State Ex Rel. Larson v. LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by94 opinions
- Sampsell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Taylor v. MeekTexas Supreme Court · 1955
- Lerner v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Wicks v. CoxTexas Supreme Court · 1948
- Helton v. CrawleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1950
89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.