United States v. Nathan Wall (95-5007) and Donald Wall (95-5008)
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court 1
92 F.3d 1444
65 USLW 2165
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Nathan WALL (95-5007) and Donald Wall (95-5008),
Defendants-Appellants.
Nos. 95-5007, 95-5008.
United States Court of Appeals,
Sixth Circuit.
Argued Oct. 2, 1995.
Decided Aug. 15, 1996.
Rehearing and Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc Denied Oct.
22, 1996.*
Van S. Vincent, Asst. U.S. Atty. (argued and briefed), Office of U.S. Atty., Nashville, TN, for plaintiff-appellee.
Cecil D. Branstetter (briefed), Carrol Kilgore (argued and briefed), Branstetter, Kilgore, Stranch & Jennings, Nashville, TN, for defendant-appellant.
Before: BOGGS…
Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Siler; Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited205 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
200 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.