Legal Opinion

Thomas v. James

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 23, 1918No. 8512PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Error from District Court, Tulsa County; Conn Linn, Judge. Missouri A. Thomas, Mabel E. Walters, and Jacob Thomas each file petition for letters of administration on the estate of John Thomas, deceased. From judgment of the district court denying the petition of Missouri A. Thomas, and appointing Mabel E. Walters administratrix, Missouri A. Thomas brings error adversely to Rozella James and others.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

STEWART, C.

Missouri A. Thomas filed petition in the county court alleging that she was the widow of John Thomas, who died intestate, and as such widow entitled to letters of administration on the estate of the deceased, or the right to name an administrator, the petitioner waiving the right to letters and requesting that N. J. Gubser, a competent and qualified person, be appointed as such administrator. Petition was also filed by Mabel E. Walters, daughter of the deceased by a former marriage, claiming the right to letters, and asserting that the deceased did not leave a surviving…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Chancey v. WhinnerySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Clark v. BarneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  3. Jones v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  4. In re Estate of MatteoteSupreme Court of Colorado · 1915
  5. Niece v. Territory of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1900

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Mudd v. PerrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  2. Oliphant v. OliphantSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
  3. Dunlap v. DunlapSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. In Re Estate of McDadeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. Marcum v. ZaringSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API