Legal Opinion
Foster v. Anable
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided March 8, 2001No. 1 CA-SA 00-0180PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WEISBERG, Judge.
¶ 1 Petitioner Cindy Foster (“Petitioner”) brings this special action challenging an order by the Arizona State Land Department Commissioner (“the Commissioner”) denying her protest of a sale of a parcel of state trust land (“Section 16”). We accept jurisdiction, but deny relief.
FACTS
¶2 The Arizona State Land Department (“Department”) ordered an appraisal of Section 16 by an independent appraiser in contemplation of selling the property. The Department’s chief appraiser then reviewed and concurred with this appraisal. On April 21, 2000, the Commissioner authorized the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Lassen v. Arizona Ex Rel. Arizona Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- State v. KorzepArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- Havasu Heights Ranch & Development Corp. v. Desert Valley Wood Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
- Martin v. MartinArizona Supreme Court · 1988
- Kadish v. Arizona State Land DepartmentArizona Supreme Court · 1987
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Banco Popular de Puerto Rico v. Negrón BarbosaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2005
- Save Our Sonoran, Inc. v. FlowersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Sanderson Lincoln Mercury, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
- State v. CowlesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
- Save Our Sonoran, Inc. v. FlowersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.