Legal Opinion
Save Our Sonoran, Inc. v. Flowers
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 25, 2005No. 02-16156, 02-16263, 02-16355PublishedCited by 92 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND. AMENDED OPINION
ORDER
The attached amended opinion is substituted for the original opinion filed by the panel. With the amendments, the panel has voted to deny the petition for rehearing.
The petition for rehearing en banc was circulated to the entire court. No judge of the court called for a vote on the petition for rehearing en banc within the time established to do so.
The petition for rehearing and petition for rehearing en banc are DENIED.
No further petitions for rehearing will be entertained.
OPINION
THOMAS, Circuit Judge.
In this appeal, we consider the management of the waterways…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Amoco Production Co. v. Village of GambellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Department of Transportation v. Public CitizenSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Sports Form, Inc., a Nevada Corporation v. United Press International, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Ecological Rights Foundation Mateel Environmental Justice Foundation v. Pacific Lumber CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- National Parks & Conservation Ass'n v. BabbittCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by92 opinions
- Rapanos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition v. Aracoma Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
- Interpipe Contracting, Inc. v. Xavier BecerraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Sierra Club v. United States Army Corps of EngineersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- Raich v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.