Legal Opinion
Jimenez v. Buttigieg
District Court, E.D. California
Decided February 9, 2024No. 2:19-cv-01458Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MARK JIMENEZ, No. 2:19-cv-01458-TLN-KJN 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 PETE BUTTIGIEG, SECRETARY OF TRANSPORTATION, 15 Defendant. 16 17 This matter is before the Court on Defendant Pete Buttigieg, Secretary of the United 18 States Department of Transportation’s (“Defendant”) Motion to Dismiss. (ECF No. 34.) Plaintiff 19 Mark Jimenez (“Plaintiff”) filed an opposition. (ECF No. 35.) Defendant filed a reply. (ECF 20 No. 37.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss. 21 (ECF…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.