AMF, Inc. v. General Motors Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SNEED, Circuit Judge:
This is an appeal from summary judgments in a treble damage antitrust action *69brought by appellant AMF, Incorporated (“AMF”) against appellees, four major American automobile manufacturers and their trade association. AMF claims that appellees, acting in concert, by agreeing not to purchase AMF’s device, excluded it from the early market in methods to limit and control air pollution, and that such action caused commercial injury cognizable under Section 4 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 15. Following the close of discovery, appellees moved for summary judgment contending…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Bigelow v. RKO Radio Pictures, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- The Flintkote Company, a Corporation v. Elmer Lysfjord and Walter R. Waldron, Doing Business as Aabeta Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re Multidistrict Vehicle Air Pollution. Amf, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. Panasonic CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Mediostream, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2012
- Free Freehand Corp. v. Adobe Systems Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2012
- Red Lion Medical Safety, Inc. v. Ohmeda, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 1999