Legal Opinion
Kareem v. Federal Deposit Insurance
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 15, 2011No. Civil Action 09-1820 (RWR)PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
RICHARD W. ROBERTS, District Judge.
I. Introduction and Background.
Pro se Plaintiff Hussain Kareem sued the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) and Johnson & Freedman II, LLC, a law firm, about matters involving foreclosure proceedings on his home mortgage. See Am. Federal Compl., ECF No. 15. The Court dismissed all claims against the FDIC because Plaintiff filed his com plaint one day late. Kareem v. F.D.I.C., No. 09-cv-1820, 2010 WL 2943149 (D.D.C. July 27, 2010). The Court reasoned that Plaintiff “timely filed a claim with the FDIC”; “the FDIC had until…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Houston v. LackSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United Mine Workers of America 1974 Pension v. Pittston Company, United Mine Workers of America 1974 Pension Trust v. Rawl Sales & Processing Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. BilzerianDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Mwabira-Simera v. Howard UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- United States v. ZaiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Walsh v. HageeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- United States v. Dynamic Visions, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Green v. American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (Afl-Cio)District Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Keepseagle v. VilsackDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc. v. United States Department of Health and Human ServicesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.