Legal Opinion
United States v. Zaia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 13, 2011No. Criminal No. 04-401 (RMC). Civil No. 09-2461 (RMC)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, District Judge.
Defendant Neeran Zaia filed a Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 [Dkt. # 213] 1 and a Motion to Reduce Sentence Under Rule 35 [Dkt. # 217]. As explained below, the pleadings and the record conclusively demonstrate that Ms. Zaia is not entitled to the relief she seeks. Accordingly, the motions will be denied.
I. FACTS
A grand jury returned a thirty-two count indictment against Ms. Zaia on September 3, 2004. The indictment charged Ms. Zaia with violations of 18 U.S.C. § 371 (Conspiracy to Commit Offenses…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Bell v. ConeSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Kimmelman v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Kareem v. Federal Deposit InsuranceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- United States v. WrightDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- United States v. AyersDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- United States v. OladokunDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Kareem v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.