People v. Tullo
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
*714. Memorandum. Venue was properly laid in Nassau County. GPL 20.40 (subd. 1, par. [a]) requires only that it be proved that conduct occurred within the county sufficient to establish one element of the offense. While venue may be established by a preponderance of the evidence (People v. Hetenyi, 304 N. Y. 80, 84) in this instance the trial court’s charge inadvertently called for a higher quantum of proof — beyond a reasonable doubt. On this record we agree with the Appellate Division that the jury was justified in finding, even under the more stringent standard, that defendant’s conduct in…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- People v. HetenyiNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
3Cited by33 opinions
- Steingut v. GoldNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- People v. RibowskyNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- People v. MooreNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- People v. GreenbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
- People v. GiordanoNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.