Legal Opinion
Gorman v. Lusk
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
Decided May 25, 1937PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Stanley, Commissioner
Affirming.
The appeal is from a judgment cancelling a coal lease made on October 12, 1933, jointly, 'by Joseph Lusk and W. B. Lusk, and their respective wives, to Perry F. Gorman. The Klenekole Mining Company joined in the lease as the owner of the mining equipment on the premises. The rent for it was to be paid to the Lusks until a certain debt that company owed them should be satisfied. The property is described as two adjoining* tracts, one being owned by Joseph Lusk and wife, and the other by W. B. Lusk and wife. They were leased for mining as…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Laurence E. Tierney Land Co. v. Kingston-Pocahontas Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
- Koppers Co. v. Asher Coal Mining Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
- Muncey Coal Mining Co. v. MunceyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1925
- Barney v. SwordCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
- Elkhorn Coal Corp. v. By-Products Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gorman v. LuskCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939
- Hixson v. ParkerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1957
- Miller Bros. Coal v. Consol of Kentucky, Inc. (In Re Clearwater Natural Resources, LP)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2009