Muncey Coal Mining Co. v. Muncey
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
*640Opinion of ti-ie Court by
Judge Dietzman
Affirming in part and reversing in part.
So far as this appeal is concerned, the controversy between the parties hereto turns on the interpretation to be given certain clauses of a coal lease made by the appellee to one Stone, and which by successive assignments has come into the ownership of the appellant.
The first cause of controversy involves the tenth clause of that lease, which reads:
“The lessee agrees to enter upon the premises hereby leased, immediately, and begin in good faith the work of development and prosecute same with reasonable diligence,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Siler v. White Star Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
- Gabbard v. SheffieldCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
- Taylor Coal Co. v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
- Nelson Creek Coal Co. v. West Point Brick & Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
- Holt v. KelleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
3Cited by12 opinions
- Laurence E. Tierney Land Co. v. Kingston-Pocahontas Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
- Hall v. Eversole's Adm'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
- Saylor v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
- Martin's Fork Coal Co. v. Harlan-Wallins Coal Corp.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1934
- Simpson v. Buckner's Adm'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.