Legal Opinion

Union Oil Co. v. Hale

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 20, 1931No. 23173. Department TwoPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMillard, J.

This is an action for specific performance. George A. Hale and Elizabeth C. Hale, a marital community, let certain premises in Whatcom county to the plaintiff for two years from September 1, 1927, by a written lease, which contained two options — one for renewal for one year, and one to purchase the premises at any time prior to August 31, 1930, which was the date of the expiration of the lease if extended under the option to renew. The agreement,- so far as material, reads as follows:

“(1) That the Lessor, for and in consideration of the payments of rent, as hereinafter set forth, and the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sandberg v. LightWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Lowman v. RussellWashington Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Superior Portland Cement, Inc. v. Pacific Coast Cement Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Thompson v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1969
  3. Time Oil Co. v. PalmerWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Wallace v. ImbertsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. Bridgeman v. Jefferson Amusement Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1947

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API