Legal Opinion

Raimondo v. Belletire

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided April 21, 1986No. 85-1991PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAUER, Circuit Judge.

Carlo Raimondo appeals the denial of his petition for writ of habeas corpus. He alleges that certain amendments to the Illinois statutes governing commitment of persons found not guilty by reason of insanity violate the constitutional guarantee against ex post facto punishment, deny him due process of law, and violate the equal protection clause. We affirm.

I

In December 1974, Raimondo was acquitted by reason of insanity of rape and. robbery by the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois. In accordance with the Uniform Corrections Code (“UCC”), Ill.Rev.Stat. ch. 38, par.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Dobbert v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Raimondo v. PavkovicAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. William J. Prater v. U.S. Parole Commission and Thomas Keohane, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
  2. Robert T. Huggins v. John Isenbarger, Chairman, Indiana Parole BoardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
  3. Milner v. ApfelCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
  4. In Re ArafilesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  5. Alston v. RobinsonDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API