Legal Opinion

Peters v. Mansfield Screw MacHine Products Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 18, 1991No. CA-2793PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Milligan, Judge.

After appellee Mansfield Screw terminated her employment, appellant Sarah Peters brought this action alleging that she had been wrongfully discharged, based on an implied contract of employment and promissory estoppel. The trial court granted summary judgment for Mansfield Screw. Appellant assigns one error:

“The trial court abused its discretion in granting the defendant’s motion for summary judgment as the defendant failed to prove that there were no genuine issues as to material facts, and that the defendants were entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”

In 1978, Dick…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smiddy v. Wedding Party, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Mers v. Dispatch Printing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Adams v. Harding Machine Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Phung v. Waste Management, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1988

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Condon v. Body, Vickers & DanielsOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Daup v. Tower Cellular, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Seta v. Reading Rock, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Callander v. Callander, 07ap-746 (5-13-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Clark v. Collins Bus Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API