State Ex Rel. Burns v. Vernon

Defendant raises these contentions on this appeal:(1) The evidence is insufficient to support the finding by the jury that defendant is the father of relator’s child.(2) If defendant does not prevail with respect to the first contention, he is entitled to a new trial because of alleged prejudicial error which resulted from the assistant corporation counsel propounding a certain question to defendant on cross-examination.(3) In any event, a new trial should be directed in the interest of justice.

Sufficiency of the Evidence.

Defendant takes the position that relator’s testimony, that she had…