State Ex Rel. Kapusta v. Weir
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDieterich, J.
The defendant contends that the evidence presented by the plaintiff was insufficient to sustain the findings of the trial court.
The complainant, Pauline Kapusta, unmarried, was delivered of her second of three children born out of wedlock on June 29, 1957. Pauline Kapusta made complaint on July 22, 1959, charging the defendant, James Harold Weir, with the paternity of the second child, Rosemarie. The complainant was twenty-nine years of age and the defendant, also unmarried, was sixty years of age.
The defendant first became acquainted with the complainant shortly before he hired her as a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Estate of EannelliWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
- State Ex Rel. Sowle v. BrittichWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
- Swazee v. LeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951
- Ische v. IscheWisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
- Lerner v. LernerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Isham v. MullallyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
- Schroedel Corp. v. State Highway CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
- State Ex Rel. Brajdic v. SeberWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
- State Ex Rel. Schlehlein v. DurisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
- Stollberg v. CrittendenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.