Legal Opinion
City of Cleveland, Ohio v. Federal Power Commission, Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company, Intervenor
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided January 9, 1976No. 73--1282PublishedCited by 77 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SPOTTSWOOD W. ROBINSON, III, Circuit Judge:
This petition for review poses centrally the question whether the Federal Power Commission erred in adopting a rate structure specified in a schedule filed by a public electric utility without resolving its municipal customer’s contention that the schedule contravenes a preexisting agreement between the parties. We answer that question in the affirmative. Accordingly, while we affirm the Commission on all other issues presented, we remand the case for further proceedings.
I
The City of Cleveland, Ohio, operates an electric light plant from which a part…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Permian Basin Area Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Montana-Dakota Utilities Co. v. Northwestern Public Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by77 opinions
- Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- City of Cleveland, Ohio v. Federal Power Commission, Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- Action on Smoking and Health v. Civil Aeronautics BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- Atlantic City Electric Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- Daily Advertiser v. TRANS-LA, ETC.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.