Story v. Ulman
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from Baltimore City Court (Phelps, J.).
1Opinion of the CourtBryan, J.
The controverted question in this case is whether Tenth street in the city of Baltimore has been dedicated as a public highway.
In May, eighteen hundred and ninety-one, the Mayor and City Council of Baltimore passed an ordinance for the condemnation and opening of this street, to be of the uniform width of sixty-six feet from the west side of Charles street westwardly to the east side of Maryland avenue. After the usual proceedings the Commissioners for Opening Streets made their estimate, awarding damages and assessing benefits. Among other awards, damages were allowed to Alfred J. Ulman for…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Peabody Heights Co. v. WillsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1895
- Hawley v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1870
- Mayor of Baltimore v. FrickCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1895
- Norris v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1876
- Hall v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1881
3Cited by8 opinions
- Beach v. North Chesapeake Beach Land & Improvement Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1937
- Starr v. Minister & Trustees of the Starr Methodist Protestant ChurchCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1910
- City of San Antonio v. SullivanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1900
- Herbert Kaufman v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1966
- Mayor of Baltimore v. Canton Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1915
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.