Legal Opinion · Dissent

Alpha Auto Sales, Inc. v. Department of State, Bureau of Professional & Occupational Affairs

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 16, 1994No. 1 Middle District Appeal Docket 1993Published

1DissentMontemuro, Justice

I dissent and would affirm based on the reasons set forth in the Commonwealth Court Opinion. The Majority premises its opinion on: 1) the Commonwealth Court’s disregard of the sound principle of limited judicial review of administrative agency decisions; and 2) public policy considerations. In concluding these vehicles are not “new vehicles” as defined in 63 Pa.S.A. § 818.10(12), the Commonwealth Court applied the proper three prong test and did not exceed its permissible scope of review.

I) Standard of Review.

The Majority first contends that the Commonwealth Court departed from the “sound…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Love v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Masland v. BachmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Habecker v. Nationwide InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. In Re the Employees of Student Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Chester Extended Care Center v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API