Legal Opinion
McKenna v. Oliver
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided September 7, 2006No. 05CA0298PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge ROTHENBERG.
In this federal consumer protection act case, plaintiff, Douglas M. McKenna, appeals the trial court's judgment dismissing for lack of subject matter jurisdiction his claims against defendants, Stephen C. Oliver; Stephen C. Oliver Holdings, Inc. d/b/a Mile High Karate; MHK South University, Inc.; Mile High Karate, LLC; and Martial Arts Marketing, LLC. Defendants cross-appeal the trial court's denial of their motion to dismiss McKenna's federal claims on the ground that he lacked standing to bring the claims as an assignee. Because we agree with defendants that…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Public Service Co. of Colorado v. Van WykSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
- Roberts v. Holland & HartColorado Court of Appeals · 1993
- Brossia v. Rick Construction, Ltd. Liabiltity Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2003
- US Fax Law Center, Inc. v. iHire, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2005
- Steamboat Springs Rental & Leasing, Inc. v. City & County of DenverColorado Court of Appeals · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- US Fax Law Center, Inc. v. Henry Schein, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2009
- Kruse v. McKennaSupreme Court of Colorado · 2008
- TMJ Hawaii, Inc. v. Nippon Trust BankHawaii Supreme Court · 2007
- US Fax Law Center, Inc. v. iHire, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Adams v. ThomasDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.