Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Burrier v. Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New York

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1963No. 36618Published

1ConcurrenceHill, J.

(concurring in the result) — I concur in the result. While I am convinced that it was error to give instruction No. 8, I am satisfied that the giving of instructions Nos. 9 and 10 made the error nonprejudicial in this case. I am fearful, however, that the result will be that the three instructions (Nos. 8, 9, and 10) will be hereafter requested and given in similar cases as a comprehensive statement of the law.

Instruction No. 8 reads:

“The sole issue in this case is whether the deceased died as a result of suicide. Where a deceased dies as a result of a gunshot wound it is presumed that his…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gardner v. SeymourWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Hutton v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Scarpelli v. Washington Water Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Kay v. Occidental Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Anning v. Rothschild & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API