Legal Opinion

In re Buttolph

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 25, 1935No. 3476PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHatfield, Judge

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the decision of tlie Primary Examiner rejecting claims 1, 2, 8, 9, 10, 23, 24, 25, 82 to 4.3, inclusive, 51 to 57, inclusive, and 61 to 67, inclusive, in appellant’s application for a patent for an alleged invention relating to improvements in vapor arc lamps, and a method for operating the same.

At the time of the oral arguments in this court, counsel for appellant moved to dismiss claims 1, 8, 9, 10, 32 to 43, inclusive, 56, 57, and 66.

Claims 2, 24, 51, and 55 are illustrative. They read:

2…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re DuncanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1920

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. W. F. & John Barnes Co. v. International Harvester Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1943
  2. Application of LeeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API