Legal Opinion

Crump v. Sadler

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 25, 1913No. 3282PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error from County Court, Jefferson County; B. T. Price, Judge. Action by D. C. Crump and S. R. Garner against R. L. Sadler and W. R. Donagan for rent, and plaintiffs caused attachment to' issue and the crops grown on the leased premises to be seized. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiffs bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

GALBRAITH, C.

D. C. Crump was the assignee of a rental contract entered into on the 22d day of December, 1910, whereby 60 acres of land, being part of the N. E. % of section 2, township 8 S., range 7 W., in Jefferson county, Okla., were “demised and leased” ho the defendant in error R. L. Sadler, for one year from that date. This lease provided that the land should be planted in cotton and that the lessee should “pay as rent money one-fourth of all the cotton grown thereon.” It further provided that “the land that is not in cultivation shall be cleared of brush and might be planted…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tootle, Wheeler & Motter Mercantile Co. v. FloydSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Turner v. WilcoxSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Greeley v. Greeley and GreeleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Silveira v. OhmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Dorsett v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Pruitt v. CarterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. Chickasaw Nat. Bank v. MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  5. Fuller v. RippieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API