Chickasaw Nat. Bank v. Martin

Opinion by

LOGSDON, C.

For reversal of this case intervener relies upon the single proposition that the tiial court erred in rendering judgment in favor of the plaintiff and in refusing to render judgment in favor of the intervener.

In support of this contention it is urged by intervener in its brief that When plaintiff and defendant entered into' the new rental contract in May, 1923, it amounted to an abandonment by plaintiff of her rights under the original rental contract entered into in November, 1922, and that the mortgage of intervener, being of record when the new contract was entered…