Legal Opinion

Rotondo Weirich Enters., Inc. v. Sundt/Layton (In re Rotondo Weirich Enters., Inc.)

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 16, 2018No. Bky. No. 15–16146 ELF JOINTLY ADMINISTERED; Adv. No. 17–185PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ERIC L. FRANK, U.S. BANKRUPTCY JUDGE

I. INTRODUCTION

Debtor Rotondo Weirich Enterprises, Inc. ("the Debtor") has filed a complaint ("the Complaint"), seeking damages from Sundt/Layton, a joint venture, Sundt Construction, Inc., Layton Construction Company, LLC (collectively "Sundt/Layton") and the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation ("the CDCR") based on alleged breaches of a construction contract.

The Debtor also seeks recovery from Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland, Zurich American Insurance Company, Federal Insurance Company and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company ("the…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Ruhrgas Ag v. Marathon Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. HERMAN GOLDNER COMPANY INC. v. NORESCO, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API