Legal Opinion
HERMAN GOLDNER COMPANY INC. v. NORESCO, LLC
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided April 3, 2023No. 2:22-cv-05047Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA HERMAN GOLDNER COMPANY INC., , Case No. 2:22-cv-05047-JDW v. NORESCO, LLC, , MEMORANDUM Broad language in an arbitration provision indicates an intent to channel a broad range of disputes to arbitration. This case exemplifies that principle. Plaintiff Herman Goldner Company Inc., a subcontractor, agreed to arbitrate “[a]ny controversy or claim arising out of or relating to” its agreement to provide labor and materials to general contractor NORESCO. When Goldner brought this suit against two sureties to collect on a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Arthur Andersen LLP v. CarlisleSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Guidotti v. Legal Helpers Debt Resolution, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
- Kirleis v. Dickie, McCamey & Chilcote, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.