Legal Opinion
Luntz Corp. v. Pub. Util. Comm.
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided October 1, 1997No. 1996-0962PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 79 Ohio St.3d 509.] LUNTZ CORPORATION, APPELLANT, v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF OHIO ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as Luntz Corp. v. Pub. Util. Comm.,
1997-Ohio-342.] Public Utilities Commission—Electric utility has no affirmative duty or obligation to conduct an ongoing review of every customer’s usage and load-demand levels to ensure that every customer is being served under the most economical tariff possible—“Distribution line” in R.C. 4933.81, construed. (No. 96-962—Submitted June 11, 1997—Decided October 1, 1997.) APPEAL from…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Time Warner AxS v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Industrial Energy Consumers of Ohio Power Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Office of Consumers' Counsel v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- City of Cleveland v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- Industrial Energy Consumers of Ohio Power Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- FirstEnergy Corp. v. Pub. Util. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002