Legal Opinion

Industrial Energy Consumers of Ohio Power Co. v. Public Utilities Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1994No. 93-505PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.

The primary issue which has been properly raised in this appeal is whether the commission approved an environmental compliance plan that was not least-cost, thereby constituting a violation of R.C. 4913.04. For the reasons that follow, we decline to disturb the commission’s determination approving Ohio Power’s plan. Accordingly, we affirm the commission’s order.

I

To begin our discussion, we note that this court is ordinarily called upon to review commission decisions involving ratemaking. Although the case before us obviously affects rates (as is true with virtually everything the commission…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Palazzi v. Estate of GardnerOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  3. At&T Communications of Ohio, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Industrial Energy Consumers of Ohio Power Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1994

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Time Warner AxS v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Canton Storage & Transfer Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. General Motors Corp. v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Luntz Corp. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API