Rosenblum v. Eisenhauer
Connecticut Superior Court
1Opinion of the CourtRubinow, J.
On February 8, 1965, the plaintiffs by assignment obtained an option to buy, in Farmington, a tract of land hereinafter referred to as the Barnett tract. The option included the following clause: “The seller agrees to permit the buyer, his heirs or assigns, to remove from the adjacent property of the seller, without cost but at the buyer’s expense a sufficient quantity of fill to bring the herein described property to a level acceptable to the buyer and the Town of Farmington.” By agreement dated March 30, 1965, the option was amended to provide, in effect, that it could be exercised up to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Rathkopf v. PearsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
- Jo-Mark Sand & Gravel Co. v. PantanellaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
- Mitchell v. HazenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1823
- Frank Towers Corp. v. LavianaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Double I Ltd. Partnership v. Plan & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Morello v. Land Reutilization CommissionNebraska Supreme Court · 2003
- 29 Main Street LLC v. United States Postal ServiceDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2022