Legal Opinion

Sardeson v. Menage

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 19, 1889PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Action to determine defendant’s adverse claim to vacant land, brought in the district court for Hennepin county and tried by Hicksy J., upon whose findings and order judgment was entered for defendant, from which the plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtVanderburgh, J.

Plaintiff is the assignee and holder of a sheriff’s certificate of sale upon mortgage foreclosure. The mortgaged premises were duly sold under a power of sale to the assignor of *315plaintiff, on the 11th day of December, 1886. The defendant is the holder of a subsequent mortgage upon the same premises, and claims that the premises were duly redeemed from the foreclosure sale referred to by the mortgagor or his grantee, and the sale thereby annulled. The validity of this redemption is called in question by the plaintiff. If the redemption was valid and effectual, plaintiff’s title or interest in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wilson v. HayesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  2. Tinkcom v. LewisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1874

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Spiegel v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1949
  2. Lightbody v. LammersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  3. Cole v. ColeUtah Supreme Court · 1942
  4. McElligott v. MillardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
  5. Moulton v. SimonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API