Lightbody v. Lammers
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Cook county to determine the adverse claims of defendants to certain vacant and unoccupied land. The case was tried before Dibell, J., who found in favor of plaintiffs. From an order denying motions to amend the findings and for a new "trial, defendants appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
-JAGGARD, J.
In this case one John Dightbody executed a mortgage covering certain lands involved in this litigation. That mortgage was assigned to "the defendant and appellant, who foreclosed it by advertisement. The ■■plaintiffs and respondents sought to redeem from the foreclosure sale :as the heirs at law of John Lightbody, deceased. Under the findings of fact and conclusions of law, the plaintiffs were entitled to judgment. From an order denying defendant’s motions to amend the findings of fact and conclusions of law, and for a new trial, this appeal was taken.
The first of defendant’s two…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Wilson v. HayesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- Tinkcom v. LewisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1874
- Bingham v. Board of Supervisors of Winona CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1863
- Todd v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Sardeson v. MenageSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re Beachside I Homeowners Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011