Legal Opinion

Florez v. Ginsberg

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided August 23, 2019No. 120129PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

No. 120,129 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS PANTALEON FLOREZ III, Appellant, v. RICK GINSBERG, SALLY ROBERTS, PAUL MARKHAM, and UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS, Appellees. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. Whether a district court erred by granting a motion to dismiss is a question of law subject to unlimited review. The appellate court will view the well-pleaded facts in a light most favorable to the plaintiff and assume as true those facts and any inferences reasonably drawn from them. If those facts and inferences state any claim upon which relief can be granted, then dismissal is improper. 2.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Kevin Ross v. Creighton UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  2. Stechschulte v. JenningsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
  3. Donohue v. Copiague Union Free School DistrictNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Finstad v. Washburn UniversitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
  5. Mahler v. Keenan Real Estate, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hernandez v. PistotnikCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020
  2. Himan v. Thor Industries, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2022
  3. In re Marriage of PoggiCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020
  4. PHH Mortgage Corporation v. StuberDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2025
  5. Wyldewood Cellars, Inc. v. Torro, LLCDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API