Legal Opinion

Himan v. Thor Industries, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided March 8, 2022No. 3:21-cv-00239Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION JEREMY HIMAN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 3:21-CV-239 JD THOR INDUSTRIES, INC., et al., Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER The five named plaintiffs in this lawsuit each bought an RV between 2015 and 2017, a choice they now wish they hadn’t made. Over the course of their ownership, they each discovered that their RVs were plagued by an axle defect that created dangerous driving conditions and forced them to rack up costly repairs. The Plaintiffs decided to file this putative class action against the manufacturers of…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Brewster McCauley v. City of ChicagCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API