Daulton v. Williams
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.
The question for decision is whether from the proof submitted an inference could reasonably have been drawn that the landlord was culpably negligent in not having warned his tenant against the danger of pressing a porcelain plumbing fixture where it had been used by the tenant for over two years and its defect was patent to the tenant users.
After appellant, her husband and their child had as tenants occupied a furnished apartment of respondent for two and a half years the good lady broke a porcelain handle on a hot water faucet into many a fragment and thereby inflicted a deep cut in her…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Kirk v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Supreme Court · 1945
- Estate of BairdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Sieber v. BlancCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Cain v. MarquezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Shotwell v. BloomCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Black v. PartridgeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Thomas v. HOUSING AUTH. OF CITY OF BREMERTONWashington Supreme Court · 1967
- Sherrard v. LidyoffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Trembley v. Capital Co.California Court of Appeal · 1949
- Ewing v. BalanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.