Legal Opinion

Trembley v. Capital Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 10, 1949No. Civ. 13883PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.

Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment in favor of defendants after an order granting a nonsuit in an action for damages for personal injuries. The sole issue presented is the correctness of the court’s order granting the nonsuit.

Facts

Having in mind that this court must accept as true all evidence tending to establish plaintiff’s case and reject all which tends to disprove it, and indulge every reasonable inference in favor of plaintiff (Williamson v. Pacific Greyhound Lines, 78 Cal.App.2d 482 [177 P.2d 977]), and that a non-suit is proper where the evidence is of such a character as not to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Goldstein v. HealyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Owen v. BeauchampCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  3. Williamson v. Pacific Greyhound LinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. Adams v. Dow HotelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  5. Reinhard v. Lawrence Warehouse Co.California Court of Appeal · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Garner v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1962
  2. Brown Hotel Company v. MarxCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1967
  3. Schafer v. Hotel Martin CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1958
  4. Nagle v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. Apper v. Eastgate AssociatesCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API