Legal Opinion
Council for Urological Interests v. Sebelius
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 24, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2009-0546PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Denying Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment; Granting Defendant’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment
BARBARA J. ROTHSTEIN, District Judge.
This case is before the Court on cross-motions for summary judgment filed by Plaintiff, the Council for Urological Interests (“CUI”), and Defendants, the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services and the United States. 1 CUI alleges that recent regulations implemented by the agency violate the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”) and the Regulatory Flexibility Act (“RFA”). Having reviewed the briefs, the Administrative Record, and the…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- TRW Inc. v. AndrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- James Madison Limited, by Norman F. Hecht, Sr., Assignee v. Eugene A. Ludwig, Comptroller of the CurrencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Council For Urological Interes v. Sylvia Mathews BurwellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
- United States ex rel. Bartlett v. AshcroftDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- Kagan v. City of New OrleansDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2013
- Council For Urological Interes v. Sylvia Mathews BurwellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
- Prevor v. United States Food & Drug AdministrationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014