Legal Opinion
Kagan v. City of New Orleans
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Decided July 9, 2013No. Civil Action No. 11-3052PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND REASONS
SUSIE MORGAN, District Judge.
Before the Court are cross-motions for summary judgment filed by plaintiffs Can-dance Kagan, Mary LaCoste, Joycelyn Cole, and Annette Watt (together, “Plaintiffs”), and defendant City of New Orleans (the “City”).1 For the following reasons, the City’s motion is GRANTED and Plaintiffs’ motion is DENIED.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs are tour guides in New Orleans, where they give walking tours of historical sites and points of interest. Some of their tours are educational, focusing on topics such as the history of the French Quarter; some are fanciful,…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Little v. Liquid Air Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Edwards v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
- Billups v. City of CharlestonDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2016
- Waugh v. Nevada State Board of CosmetologyDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2014