Legal Opinion
Falk v. State Bar of Mich.
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided December 29, 1983No. 60722, (Calendar No. 14)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Per curiam
Disposition of this matter requires us to determine whether petitioner Falk is entitled to the relief he prayed for in his "Petition for Special Relief’ originally filed November 30, 1977.
A majority of the Court is not persuaded that he is so entitled and, accordingly, the relief requested in the Petition for Special Relief is denied.
This proceeding has convinced us all, however, that certain practices of the State Bar may warrant closer scrutiny pursuant to our duty to superintend its activities. We will in the near future, therefore, by separate administrative order, appoint a committee to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- West Virginia State Board of Education v. BarnetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Keyishian v. Board of Regents of Univ. of State of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Shuttlesworth v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Keller v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- Schneider v. Colegio De Abogados De Puerto RicoDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1988
- Rosenthal v. Justices of the Supreme Court of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- People v. JensenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
- Romany v. Colegio de Abogados de Puerto RicoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.