Legal Opinion

Care Choices, HMO v. Engstrom

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided November 6, 2001No. 01-71792PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR DISMISSAL, DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS, AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

ROBERTS, District Judge.

I. Introduction

This matter is before the Court on Defendant Elizabeth Engstrom’s Motion for Dismissal or For Summary Judgment, and Motion for Sanctions, and on Plaintiff Care Choices HMO’s Motion for Summary Judgment. The Motions raise a number of issues, but the Court’s resolution of one renders most of the remaining moot: for the reasons stated below, the Court holds that it does not have subject matter jurisdiction…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Touche Ross & Co. v. RedingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. The Ohio National Life Insurance Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  4. California v. Sierra ClubSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Madison-Hughes v. ShalalaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Care Choices Hmo, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Elizabeth Engstrom, Defendant-Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API